Any site owner or even a general CMS user would agree to the fact that WordPress has revolutionized content handling and editing. And, with this, our usual HTML intricate coding methods and other specifications have taken a back seat. With every new day, people all over the world are opting to convert HTML to WordPress. The only reason being the front and back end easy handling and customization that comes with this chance.
Now you must be wondering why do we feel the need to switch at all? Well, it goes without saying that both these platforms have their own perks. WordPress however due to its numerous plugins, templates, and WordPress website development options with almost zero knowledge of intricate coding background has outsmarted the conventional ways of HTML-based CMS.
However, the biggest difference can be seen in the long-standing fight between HTML Text Editors and WordPress Visuals. Both are well used and widely popular modes of designing and creating layouts for websites. Still, there lie some key differences which make each of the two differ when it comes to working.
In simpler terms, WordPress Visual is an editing mode. It is the default mode assigned by WordPress which resembles a word processor in so many ways. Using the editing option present here, you can easily employ text formatting, data insertions, alignment options, etc.
Like the default WordPress visual option, text editors to provide all the options of a word processor. They are best suited for those who still prefer working with HTML as all the editing and extra insertion from the outer source here is done by using HTML. Therefore, unlike visual, this method gives you a limited package for editing thereby being one of the prime reasons to convert HTML to WordPress.
Now, let’s compare these two in detail so as to get a clear picture.
In terms of compatibility WordPress, visuals work as easy as a piece of cake. Even if your original work be it writing, editing, or hyperlinking is done on outer sources like MS Word, Notepad, Excel, WordPress visuals is quite acceptable towards the changes. Now, the story of HTML text editors are not the same, the formatting may be a bit difficult for you as text editors don’t usually recognize the changes made over an outer source.
Well, the WordPress visuals have more than text editing in its palette when it comes to WordPress website development. It comes very handily while inserting images, linking, posting, alignments, and page-setups. And what’s more, you can further improve their overall look using any of the plugin or template options which themselves can be downloaded for free. Visuals have a toolbar fool of such varied editing options.
Now, the same can be done with HTML text editors provided you know all about the not so easy HTML coding. HTML editors allow plain text formatting by default but for advanced changes, it needs extra support from the coder’s end.
WordPress Visuals is by default compatible with each of the free or premium plugin type. It can help in setting all sorts of sites and promote its working and advancement. The HTML editor, however, needs CSS and PHP support from the back end coding to enable and enhance its compatibility.
As opposed to the extendable WordPress Visuals, HTML editor tools are fixed and very rigid. Of course, you can change and enhance the source code of a particular page to change the editing options but think about the extra time and effort it takes from your end Plus, there is no guarantee that the code is going to run in the first go, you might have to give it re-runs in order to get the best result.
In all fairness, WordPress Visuals strictly adhere to the ‘What You See Is What You Get’ formula. It means that whatever function is specified by that particular tool or attachment, it will be served and executed in no time with a similar result. There can be different variations in the output but each of them has a different set of commands and combinations of steps followed. HTML editors, in contrast, have a purist policy, which means that their output may or may not be dependent upon your desired result from a particular code. Sometimes there are can be deviations and changes.
Both the options here have their own perks as it depends upon the user. There is safety in following the conventional method of coding through HTML for some, whereas some of us are experimental when it comes to CMS. After going through the major differences given above, you can choose what suit your taste.